In our last post, we considered the analysis of beam and raft foundation of a G+1 building using Staad Pro software. In this particular post we are going to consider the analysis and design of the same foundation using manual calculations according to the principles of the Eurocodes. If you missed the last post, you can read it by clicking on the link below;

An Investigation on the Analysis of Beam and Raft Foundation Using Staad Pro

Also download structural analysis and design of swimming pools and underground water tanks (with excel spreadsheet and video tutorials) by following the link below;

Analysis and design of swimming pools and underground water tanks

The axial forces in the ground floor columns have been presented in Figure 3, and have been used to demonstrate how you can carry out design of beam and raft foundation manually. It is important to point out that the use of ground beams with relatively large depth is usually based on DPC considerations, since the raft slab functions as the ground floor slab too. The raft slab layout and column loads are shown in figure 2 and 3 respectively.

Fig 2: Raft foundation layout |

Fig 3: Column loads on raft foundation |

The schematic diagram of the interaction of a typical beam and raft slab is shown in Figure 4.

Fig 4: Schematic representation of beam and raft slab action |

*Design Data*Allowable bearing capacity of soil = 40 kPa

Dimension of all columns = 230 x 230 mm

Dimension of all ground beams = 1200 x 250 mm

Thickness of ground floor slab = 150 mm

*Analysis of the raft slab by rigid approach*A little consideration of Figure 3 will show that the foundation is loaded is symmetrically in the x-direction, therefore we will compute the eccentricity of the load in the z-direction.

Sum of load on gridline D = 79 + 168 + 168 + 79 = 494 kN

Sum of load on gridline C = 173 + 384 + 384 + 173 = 1114 kN

Sum of load on gridline B = 225 + 498 + 498 + 225 = 1446 kN

Sum of load on gridline A = 108 + 235 + 235 + 108 = 686 kN

Fig 5: Load on the raft slab |

Resultant of loads R = 686+ 1446 + 1114 + 494 = 3740 kN

Taking moment about the centroid of the base as shown in Figure 4 above;

M = (-686 x 7.5) - [1446 x (7.5 - 6)] + [1114 x (7.5 - 4)] + (494 x 7.5) = 290 kNm

Eccentricity of the load e = M/R =290/3740 = 0.0775 m to the right hand side

The base dimensions are taken as follows;

L = 6 + 6 + 6 + 0.25 = 18.25 m

B = 6 + 5 + 4 + 0.25 = 15.25m

Pressure distribution P

*i*= (R/A) ± (6.R.e/LB

^{2})

On substituting and solving;

P

_{max}= 13.847 kPa

P

_{min}= 13.028 kPa

These values are way below the allowable bearing capacity of the soil, therefore there is no need to increase the dimensions of the base. Also, due to the close values of P

_{max}and P

_{min}, instead of using trapezoidal pressure distribution, we can assume rectangular pressure distribution using the maximum pressure.

**Note**

Pressure distribution calculation is carried out using SLS load, but we used ULS here. You can convert from ULS to SLS for simple buildings when using Eurocode by using a factor of 1.37 (

*).*

**Ubani, 2017**Therefore, using a pressure of 13.847 kPa, we can design the raft slabs and the ground beams using the conventional methods which I believe that we are familiar with.

Some screenshots from the manual design is shown below;

Manual Design of Beam and Raft Foundation to Eurocode 2 [PDF]

*References***Ubani O.U. (2017)**: Practical Structural Analysis and Design of Residential Buildings Using Staad Pro V8i, CSC Orion, and Manual Calculations. Ist Edition, Volume 1.

*Structville Integrated Services*

*To download the above named textbook, click on the image below;*

Hello, I have browsed most of your posts. This post is probably where I got the most useful information for my research. Thanks for posting, maybe we can see more on this. Are you aware of any other websites on this subject. ux design agency san francisco

ReplyDeleteThanks for this piece

ReplyDeleteIs there an assumption that columns connected to raft foundations don't transmit moments or they are modelled as pinned to the base

ReplyDelete